CHAP. 53.—THE ENORMOUS PRICE OF SILVER PLATE.
It is not, however, only for vast quantities of plate that there
is such a rage among mankind, but even more so, if possible,
for the plate of peculiar artists: and this too, to the exculpation
of our own age, has long been the case. C. Gracchus
possessed some silver dolphins, for which he paid five thousand
sesterces per pound. Lucius Crassus, the orator, paid
for two goblets chased by the hand of the artist Mentor,[1] one
hundred thousand sesterces: but he confessed that for very
shame he never dared use them, as also that he had other
articles of plate in his possession, for which he had paid at
the rate of six thousand sesterces per pound. It was the conquest
of Asia[2] that first introduced luxury into Italy; for we
find that Lucius Scipio, in his triumphal procession, exhibited
one thousand four hundred pounds' weight of chased silver,
with golden vessels, the weight of which amounted to one
thousand five hundred pounds. This[3] took place in the year
from the foundation of the City, 565. But that which inflicted
a still more severe blow upon the Roman morals, was
the legacy of Asia,[4] which King Attalus[5] left to the state at
his decease, a legacy which was even more disadvantageous
than the victory of Scipio,[6] in its results. For, upon this
occasion, all scruple was entirely removed, by the eagerness
which existed at Rome, for making purchases at the auction
of the king's effects. This took place in the year of the City,
622, the people having learned, during the fifty-seven years
that had intervened, not only to admire, but to covet even,
the opulence of foreign nations. The tastes of the Roman
people had received, too, an immense impulse from the conquest
of Achaia,[7] which, during this interval, in the year of
the City, 608, that nothing might be wanting, had introduced
both statues and pictures. The same epoch, too, that saw the
birth of luxury, witnessed the downfall of Carthage; so that,
by a fatal coincidence, the Roman people, at the same moment,
both acquired a taste for vice and obtained a license
for gratifying it.
Some, too, of the ancients sought to recommend themselves
by this love of excess; for Caius Marius, after his victory over
the Cimbri, drank from a cantharus,[8] it is said, in imitation
of Father Liber;[9] Marius, that ploughman[10] of Arpinum, a
general who had risen from the ranks.![11]
1. His age and country are uncertain. We learn, however, from Chapter
55 of this Book, that he flourished before the burning of the Temple of
Diana at Ephesus, B.C. 356. He is frequently mentioned in the classical
writers. See also B. vii. c. 39.
2. He includes, probably, under this name both Asia Minor and Syria.
See a similar passage in Livy, B. xxxix.
3. This passage is rejected by Sillig as a needless interpolation.
4. Asia Minor.
5. King of Pergamus.
6. Over King Antiochus.
7. He alludes to the destruction of Corinth, by L. Mummius Achaïcus.
8. A drinking cup with handles, sacred to Bacchus. See B. xxxiv. c. 25.
9. Bacchus.
10. In allusion to the plebeian origin of C. Marius, who was born at the
village of Cereatæ, near Arpinum. It is more than probable that the
story that he had worked as a common peasant for wages, was an invention
of the faction of Sylla.
11. "Ille arator Arpinas, et manipularis imperator."